a business woman and man viewing a dashboard on a tablet device
May 28, 2025

How to Preserve Audience Integrity When You Migrate CDPs

Switching customer data platforms isn’t just a technical migration—it’s a strategic risk.

You’ve spent years refining how audiences are built, labeled, and used. Marketing teams know which lists convert. Sales teams trust certain segments. If that breaks during a platform switch, it doesn’t just slow things down—it erodes confidence.

At Soli & Co, we specialize in migrations that preserve what works while unlocking what’s next. Here’s how we help teams protect audience integrity when moving to a new CDP—especially from tools like Omeda into platforms like Lytics.


Document Audience Purpose—Not Just Audience Names

Many teams have dozens of “high performers” that are only understood informally. Segments like:

  • “Mid-Funnel Webinar – Q4”
  • “Bounced Back in Jan”
  • “Brand X Leads (Rebuilt 2022)”

If you migrate without knowing what these audiences represent, you’ll lose them in translation.

One team lost 40% of their key segments by relying on audience names only.

We help teams:

  • Identify which audiences are still active and valuable
  • Map them to business use cases (re-engagement, upsell, nurture, etc.)
  • Document the underlying logic—not just the label
Soli & Co’s Take: If it’s not documented, it can’t be preserved.

Rebuild with Real Logic, Not Literal Copies

CDP migrations shouldn’t be a copy-paste exercise. Field names, stream structures, and event granularity all differ across platforms.

  • We reverse-engineer the intent of legacy audiences and rebuild them using:
  • Cleaned and unified behavioral streams
  • Consistent taxonomy (e.g., brand_name, asset_type)
  • Flexible logic that matches real-time behavior, not just static lists

This approach often leads to better-performing segments—not because they’re new, but because they’re finally right.

Soli & Co’s Take: Audience parity means matching outcomes, not syntax.

Address Field Translation and Legacy Codes

Platforms like Omeda often rely on internal fields that require decoding—like by_specify tags or embedded campaign metadata. If those values aren’t translated correctly, you lose granularity and control.

We handle:

  • Mapping cryptic or internal field values into human-readable logic
  • Creating field-level translation tables for use in stream processing
  • Validating migrated data against source-of-truth exports

In one case, we used a seed file to translate dozens of brand and category codes into structured dimensions that made Lytics audiences both accurate and understandable.

Soli & Co’s Take: Migration clarity starts at the field level.

Run Side-by-Side Audience Comparisons

Trust doesn’t come from turning off the old system—it comes from proving the new one works.

We guide teams through:

  • Rebuilding 3–5 key audiences in both platforms
  • Comparing user counts, logic alignment, and campaign performance
  • Spotting where legacy systems over- or under-qualified users

This builds confidence for internal stakeholders—and ensures nothing critical falls through the cracks.

Soli & Co’s Take: Side-by-side validation turns fear into confidence.

QA Real Users—Not Just Record Counts

A final step:

  • Go beyond numbers. Review profiles.
  • Do user timelines reflect expected behavior?
  • Are identity graphs stitching across streams correctly?
  • Does audience membership update over time based on real activity?

We sample profiles and follow the logic end-to-end—just like your campaign teams will.

Soli & Co’s Take: You’re not migrating data—you’re migrating decisions.

Migrate With Confidence, Not Chaos

Modernizing your CDP shouldn’t mean losing what works. With the right strategy, you can protect key segments and evolve with confidence. Let’s make your audience strategy future-ready.

Talk to us about a clean migration →