a business woman and man viewing a dashboard on a tablet device
May 21, 2025

Migrating from Omeda to Lytics: A Strategic Approach

Omeda encourages list-first thinking. Lytics requires logic-first design.

That means instead of asking, “Which lists should we migrate?” we ask:

  • What defines a re-engagement segment in your world?
  • What traits matter for brand affinity or product interest?
  • What are the activation points—and how are they expressed in your data?

From there, we reverse-engineer audience definitions that don’t depend on static lists—but replicate their intent using behavior, demographics, and unified identifiers.

Soli & Co’s Take: Don’t bring your old constraints into your new platform.


Rebuild Streams with Future Use in Mind

Omeda pipelines are often tightly coupled to specific platform features. Lytics expects cleaner streams that support flexible activation.

We help teams:

  • Map Omeda data into user-level and activity-level Lytics streams
  • Normalize fields like product_type, brand, campaign_category, and source_channel
  • Translate legacy values (like “by specify” fields or custom codes) into clean, readable logic

In one migration, we turned demographic fields scattered across multiple Omeda tables into a single, wide-format stream—usable for targeting, reporting, and onboarding.

Soli & Co’s Take: Your new streams should serve both people and platforms.

Solve Identity Early, Not Late

One of the most common post-migration regrets is waiting too long to address identity resolution.

In Omeda, identity is tied closely to customer IDs. In Lytics, it’s more flexible—but also more fragile without the right stitching fields.

That’s why we:

  • Define a clear matching hierarchy from the start (email, user_id, internal ID)
  • Set expectations about how identities behave across tools and time
  • Run early profile sampling to ensure stitching and behavior accumulation are working as expected

Soli & Co’s Take: Identity is the difference between 10K users and 10K fragmented profiles.

4. Build Trust Through Transparent Testing

Migrating from Omeda means teaching internal teams to trust a new source of truth.

We make that easier by:

  • Rebuilding a handful of legacy audiences in both systems side by side
  • Showing match counts and logic differences
  • Highlighting where Lytics offers clarity—and where the old system masked issues

This isn’t about “selling” the new platform. It’s about de-risking the transition and getting buy-in through data.

Soli & Co’s Take: Trust is a migration milestone—not just a feeling.

5. Measure Early Activation, Not Just Completion

We don’t consider a migration successful when the streams are connected—we consider it successful when the first campaign runs confidently from a Lytics audience.

That’s why we focus on:

  • Defining 1–2 campaign use cases during migration
  • Building the audiences to support them
  • Monitoring performance, match rates, and internal usage metrics

That first win accelerates adoption—and makes the rest of the migration feel worthwhile.

Soli & Co’s Take: The best way to finish a migration is to start activating.

Still On Omeda? You’re Not Alone. But You’re Not Stuck.

You don’t have to leap blindly—many teams use Omeda while ramping up in Lytics. Ready to move beyond lists and activate smarter? We can help.

Let’s talk about what’s possible →