Omeda encourages list-first thinking. Lytics requires logic-first design.
That means instead of asking, “Which lists should we migrate?” we ask:
From there, we reverse-engineer audience definitions that don’t depend on static lists—but replicate their intent using behavior, demographics, and unified identifiers.
Soli & Co’s Take: Don’t bring your old constraints into your new platform.
Omeda pipelines are often tightly coupled to specific platform features. Lytics expects cleaner streams that support flexible activation.
We help teams:
In one migration, we turned demographic fields scattered across multiple Omeda tables into a single, wide-format stream—usable for targeting, reporting, and onboarding.
Soli & Co’s Take: Your new streams should serve both people and platforms.
One of the most common post-migration regrets is waiting too long to address identity resolution.
In Omeda, identity is tied closely to customer IDs. In Lytics, it’s more flexible—but also more fragile without the right stitching fields.
That’s why we:
Soli & Co’s Take: Identity is the difference between 10K users and 10K fragmented profiles.
Migrating from Omeda means teaching internal teams to trust a new source of truth.
We make that easier by:
This isn’t about “selling” the new platform. It’s about de-risking the transition and getting buy-in through data.
Soli & Co’s Take: Trust is a migration milestone—not just a feeling.
We don’t consider a migration successful when the streams are connected—we consider it successful when the first campaign runs confidently from a Lytics audience.
That’s why we focus on:
That first win accelerates adoption—and makes the rest of the migration feel worthwhile.
Soli & Co’s Take: The best way to finish a migration is to start activating.
You don’t have to leap blindly—many teams use Omeda while ramping up in Lytics. Ready to move beyond lists and activate smarter? We can help.